Paint patches, not lines
|Calendula and Degas|
20 x 16
Painting students often ask me how to loosen up edges in their work -how to get rid of the outline - and it's both easy and hard. Easy, because they should simply avoid starting with a firm, decisive drawing to begin with, and hard because it requires that they look at the world in a whole different way.
It's natural for all of us to stare closely at a scene to acquire as much information and detail as possible, but that won't make a loose painting; that's the way to a tight painting. Instead of looking directly at a scene and seeing discreet, separate objects, I advise students to squint or unfocus their eyes, or look at a scene through peripheral vision in order to see the continuous masses of tone, the notes of colour, the general shapes and sizes of things, including negative spaces. And all the while they should consciously avoid naming what they're looking at.
As soon as I say to myself: "I'm painting the eye of the little statue," I'm lost. Then I start to include too much information in an attempt to make a distinct "eye" for the viewer. Instead, if my interior chatter is more like "I'm painting a little light shape of about this size, colour, and temperature into this part of a big dark shape" I stand more chance of creating an area that's suggestive of an eye but doesn't belabour the point. I'm more likely to make an general, rather than a specific, statement.
Painting is about masses; drawing is about line, and while great draughtsmen like Degas regularly incorporated line into paintings, the works still felt like paintings, not coloured drawings. The interaction of masses and colours were more important than the lines within the piece. In other words, you could remove the lines, and still have a good painting. Squinting at the painting below will show this.
|Two Ballet Dancers by Edgar Degas|
So: look at the world in a whole new way and avoid naming things, and your edges will naturally change.