The problems with photo references in my latest Artsy article

Orange and Blue
11 x 14
I've always spent a lot of my time working from life, feeling that the work I produce from the real world resonates with me long after I've completed it.  Maybe it's because the paintings done from life are imbued with so many more memories and impressions than those that I've done from photos. 

I can recall the changing quality of the light on my subject, and how flickers of colour revealed and concealed themselves as time passed.  As well, I remember the mental gymnastics that it took to acknowledge what my eyes were seeing, but paint something else because it better recreated the sensation of the scene.  In the painting above - done at breakneck speed while the sun tracked across my studio through a skylight - I saw intense, highly saturated, hot orange along the top edge of the flower, but when I painted it that way, it didn't say "light" in the same way that a cooler, lighter colour statement did.  So objective reality had to be sacrificed to convey the deeper truth that I saw in the scene.

I firmly believe that painters will learn more from painting a simple piece of fruit every day, on different coloured papers, and in different light conditions, than they would by painting a photo every day.  They'll discover how the world of light and colour works, and how much they need to bend that knowledge to their artistic ends.

My latest Artsy article goes into greater depth about how human and camera views of the world differ.  I hope you'll have a read.

Happy painting!


Comments